Putting Probes in Perspective

Figure 1: Probe, cable, and oscilloscope form a system
that makes or breaks the accuracy of signal acquisitions

Few aspects of using an oscilloscope are as important as the probe: after all, the probe forms both the mechanical and electrical interfaces between the device under test (DUT) and the oscilloscope itself. To feed a signal into an oscilloscope, we're limited to a coaxial connection. Thus, we need a geometry transformer that picks up the signal of interest from the DUT and transfers it to the oscilloscope's coaxial connection.

Probing Techniques and Tradeoffs (Part VIII): Gain/Attenuation vs. Noise

Figure 1: Noise comparison of a
Teledyne LeCroy D1605 probe and
a competing model

When discussing oscilloscope probes and dynamic range as we've been doing of late, we must also touch upon the associated topics of internal gain/attenuation and how that relates to noise.

Power-Rail Noise: Small Signal, Big DC Offset

Figure 1: Your
scope's vertical
adjust has its
limits

We've been working through the various challenges in making power-rail noise measurements. One of those challenges is RF pickup that can often swamp the noise signal, and the way around that is to ensure a coaxial connection from the oscilloscope's input down to the power rail itself. We want a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), so we're better off with a 1X probe than with a 10X attenuating probe. We want high bandwidth, so we want a 50-Ω termination at the oscilloscope input.

Bandwidth vs. Current Load in Power-Rail Measurements

Figure 1: Connecting a 6" length of coaxial cable between
a low-impedance power rail and a 1-MΩ input impedance
produces reflections and ringing artifacts
on your signal acquisition

Among the various challenges we've discussed in measuring noise on power rails are RF pickup and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Here's another: how do you achieve high bandwidth in your measurements while also minimizing current load on your DUT? Given that your DUT is a power rail, you really don't want to draw too much current from it. But these two measurement criteria are at loggerheads with each other. It's a quandary, and it has to do with the fundamental nature of signals on interconnects.

How 10X Attenuating Probes Kill Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Figure 1: Signal waveforms captured using a 10X attenuating
probe (top) and a BNC probe (bottom) with tips open

We've begun discussing things that can derail (see what we did there?) your power-rail measurements, such as the deleterious effects of RF interference. In the same context, one should always be mindful of certain characteristics of oscilloscope probes; namely, the 10X attenuating probes that are often lying around on the testbench.

The Fundamentals of PAM4

PAM4 doubles the number of bits in serial data transmissions
by increasing the number of levels of pulse-amplitude modulation,
but does so at the cost of noise susceptibility

As our society's hunger for data grows—not only more data, but more data delivered faster—older modulation schemes based on NRZ-type encoding grow increasingly inadequate. We need to get data from point A to point B as efficiently as possible, whether that means between chips on a PC board or from one end of a long-haul optical fiber to the other. A modulation scheme that's gaining favor in many quarters is PAM4, and in this post we'll look at the basics of PAM4 before turning to the test and analysis challenges it poses.